Our ESG Approach

ESG Integration

U Ethical’s investment process integrates ESG considerations with the aim of minimising investment risk and identifying investment opportunities.

Informed by our Ethical Investment Philosophy, we seek out companies producing goods or providing services that appropriately manage their impact on society and the environment according to industry best-practice, industry standards and/or voluntary frameworks. We also screen out companies that do not meet our selection criteria.   

Our Approach to ESG

Environmental Social Governance

U Ethical’s investment approach includes building an ethical/ESG profile that identifies risks and opportunities and is completed prior to any investment. It includes identifying and quantifying earnings/valuation impacts from material ESG issues or adjusting qualitative assessments that affect portfolio positioning. This ensures that targeted investments align with the Ethical Investment Policy, meet ESG criteria and identify areas for future engagement activity. 

Positive screening  

We seek to invest in companies that align with our ethical investment philosophy through positive screening. For equities, this information constitutes a part of our overall ESG score for companies. 

For Australian and international equities, we utilise the MSCI ESG Sustainable Impact Metrics (SIM) framework for an initial screen. This assesses product and services revenue alignment to the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (UN SDGs) across six Environment Impact and seven Social Impact categories where relevant.  All 17 UN SDGs are assessed in the net alignment analysis from Strongly Aligned to Strongly Misaligned. This is followed by an internal review. We also screen for companies that indirectly support these categories across the value chain and are aligned to longer-term investment themes.   

Fundamental Rating

Quantitative

  • Return on Equity
  • Earning per share growth
  • Free Cash Flow Yield (non-financials)
  • Price/book (financials)
  • Dividend Yield

Qualitative

  • Industry growth
  • Competitive position
  • Management / Board

ESG

  • Low carbon transition management
  • Weighted key ESG issues
  • Maximum revenue alignment to UN SDGs

Scoring

Factors score based on historical quintiles or assessment from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest).

These are aggregated into a fundamental rating (score /100)

Fundamental Rating

Strong

Above Average

Average

Below Average

Weak

ESG controversies

U Ethical monitors ethical and ESG controversies to ensure that companies and issuers held in portfolios comply with the Ethical Investment Policy.  A range of sources are used to monitored controversies.  These include MSCI ESG Research alerts, ISS Governance research, broker reports, news publications, Bloomberg, industry bodies such as Responsible Investment Association Australasia, United Nations Principles of Responsible Investing, Certified Financial Analyst Institute and relationships with not-for-profit organisations such as the Uniting Church Australia, Justice and International Mission Cluster (JIM), Australasian Centre for Corporate Responsibility and ShareAction among others.   

Our Investment Approach

As an ethical and responsible investor, we hold the companies in which we invest to high standards.

Our Stewardship Approach

As an ethical and responsible investor, we hold the companies in which we invest to high standards.